The Democrat's Case for Allowing Trump’s SCOTUS pick
greermcvay.substack.com
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has been in a better place barely five days and my phone, social media, and all media in general, has not stopped blaring hysteria from all corners of the political world. Republicans, as if on a pre-set timer, are flexing their hypocritical muscle by assuring the world that the irreplaceable Ginsburg will quickly be “replaced” by a person likely to be her polar opposite and dismantler of her legacy. Democrats, conversely, are wringing their collective hands and wearing carpet to a threadbare state from their elliptical pacing, while demanding the fairness of a slow deliberation of the Supreme Court’s next occupant, which they argue is only possible upon the ascension of Joe Biden to the nation’s highest office. Without inviting the wrath of the political left, I urge Democrats to let go and let Trump make the mistake his selection will surely prove to be.
The Democrat's Case for Allowing Trump’s SCOTUS pick
The Democrat's Case for Allowing Trump’s…
The Democrat's Case for Allowing Trump’s SCOTUS pick
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has been in a better place barely five days and my phone, social media, and all media in general, has not stopped blaring hysteria from all corners of the political world. Republicans, as if on a pre-set timer, are flexing their hypocritical muscle by assuring the world that the irreplaceable Ginsburg will quickly be “replaced” by a person likely to be her polar opposite and dismantler of her legacy. Democrats, conversely, are wringing their collective hands and wearing carpet to a threadbare state from their elliptical pacing, while demanding the fairness of a slow deliberation of the Supreme Court’s next occupant, which they argue is only possible upon the ascension of Joe Biden to the nation’s highest office. Without inviting the wrath of the political left, I urge Democrats to let go and let Trump make the mistake his selection will surely prove to be.